Which factor is NOT considered when assessing a civil penalty by the Board?

In the context of assessing a civil penalty by the Board, the factors that are taken into account generally revolve around the impact of the violation and the intentions or benefits gained from it. The public's interest, the severity of the violation, and the economic benefits gained by the violator all play significant roles in determining the appropriate penalty.

The public's interest is essential as the Board must consider how the violation affects the community and the general trust in the profession. Additionally, the severity of the violation helps in gauging the appropriate level of response; more serious violations typically attract more severe penalties. Economic benefits gained by the violator inform the Board of any undue advantages taken that could warrant a heavier penalty to discourage such behavior in the future.

In contrast, the licensee's experience, while relevant in many contexts, is not one of the critical factors for assessing civil penalties. The Board may not prioritize a licensee's years of practice over the other factors, as the focus is on the violation's impact rather than the individual’s background or experience level. This helps ensure that assessments are consistent and focused on maintaining standards rather than being influenced by the individual's history.