What must be shown when intersecting boundary lines are non-radial or nontangential?

When intersecting boundary lines are non-radial or nontangential, it is necessary to demonstrate the chord bearing and distance. This requirement stems from the need to accurately describe the geometry of the intersection when traditional radial or tangential methods are not applicable.

In cases involving non-standard boundary lines—such as curves or irregular shapes—the chord bearing and distance provide essential details about the straight-line connection between the boundary points, allowing for proper delineation on a survey map. The chord details help convey the specific angle and length of the portions of the boundary that lie between the points of intersection, which is vital for ensuring precision in the boundaries and for any legal or administrative processes related to property delineation.

The other options, while relevant in certain contexts, do not specifically address the requirements for intersections of boundary lines that lack radial or tangential alignment. Easement widths might pertain to rights of way but do not directly contribute to defining the intersection under similar circumstances. The surveyor's name and license number are important for credentialing and accountability, but they do not pertain to the geometrical characterization of boundary intersections. Boundary line adjustments are relevant for changing property lines but do not specifically inform the scenario of non-radial or nontangential